01
Apply
Start through contact with your Postgres footprint, migration workflow, and the kind of review pain your team is dealing with.
Cloud beta, design partner program
The free CLI is available today. The paid offer is a small design partner program for teams that want a more accountable migration review process around real production Postgres workflows. Access today is by application and manual onboarding, not a self-serve signup.
What the offer is
The free analyzer stays local. The design partner offer is where we help a real team turn risky Postgres changes into a review process with clearer defaults, approvals, and accountability.
Step 1
Start with the shipped OSS analyzer.Roll the CLI and editor checks into the repository your team already uses for migrations.
Step 2
Define how risky changes should be reviewed.We help shape what happens when HIGH and CRITICAL migrations are flagged in your workflow.
Step 3
Enable governance around one production scope.The pilot stays narrow and accountable so the team can prove out approvals, policy, and review evidence in one real workflow.
Built with the cohort
The open-source analyzer stays local. The design partner program is where we validate the collaboration and enforcement layer teams ask for once the first incident hurts.
We are exploring sign-off flows for HIGH and CRITICAL migrations before they merge, with an auditable approver trail.
We are shaping central controls for lock-timeout rules, risk thresholds, and exemptions so teams can enforce shared guardrails.
We are validating what teams need recorded about analyses, approvals, and bypasses for review and compliance evidence.
The public analyzer already supports stats snapshots for size-aware risk scoring, so future governance workflows do not need direct production database credentials.
Best fit
The design partner program is for teams with real migration risk, not casual curiosity.
You use Postgres in production and schema changes can create real customer impact if review goes wrong.
You ship migrations through Prisma, TypeORM, Knex, Sequelize, Drizzle, or mixed raw SQL workflows.
Application teams own schema changes and need better review consistency before merge.
You care about approvals, policy, and auditability, not just one more lint check.
Why pay now
The reason to pay is not better detection. The reason to pay is better control over risky changes across the team.
If migration review quality changes with whoever reviews the PR, you already have an organizational problem, not just a tooling problem.
Teams pay when they need a clean answer to who approved a risky migration, why it was approved, and what safeguards were expected.
If the company needs review evidence for audits, internal controls, or customer trust, migration changes cannot stay an informal side process.
One migration that blocks reads or writes can cost far more than a focused pilot around safer review and escalation.
How company access works today
The current access path is a scoped, paid pilot with direct onboarding. We keep the rollout narrow so the team can prove out the workflow before anything broader exists.
01
Start through contact with your Postgres footprint, migration workflow, and the kind of review pain your team is dealing with.
02
We use a short call to confirm there is a real production workflow, real ownership, and urgency around migration governance.
03
If there is a fit, we keep the rollout narrow around one production database or one production application workflow and agree success criteria.
04
We provision access with your team manually, guide the rollout, and enable cohort features as the governance product is hardened.
We are looking for a handful of teams with painful migration workflows and clear urgency. If there is a fit, we scope one workflow, agree on the pilot, and onboard the company manually instead of sending you to a fake signup flow.